By Jonathan Ross, Jonathan Ross14 February 2003
On 18 December 2002, the Court of Appeal held that the directors of the claimant had exceeded their authority by inserting a 'poison pill' into the agreement in an effort to prevent the possibility of any takeover.
You must be logged in to continue
Register for free to finish this article
Due to the unprecedented challenge facing our industry at this time propertyweek.com will be entirely free to view to all users until 19 April. Register now to benefit from the following:
To access this article REGISTER NOW
Would you like print copies, app and digital replica access too? SUBSCRIBE for as little as £5 per week.