By Jonathan Ross and Jonathan Ross14 February 2003
On 18 December 2002, the Court of Appeal held that the directors of the claimant had exceeded their authority by inserting a 'poison pill' into the agreement in an effort to prevent the possibility of any takeover.
You must be logged in to continue
Try Property Week For Free to finish this article.
Sign up now for the following benefits:
To access this article TRY FOR FREE NOW
Don’t want full access? REGISTER NOW to read this article and up to 3 more this month and subscribe to our newsletters.
Registered users and subscribers SIGN IN here to continue
Site powered by Webvision Cloud