Who's suing whom

On 18 December 2002, the Court of Appeal held that the directors of the claimant had exceeded their authority by inserting a 'poison pill' into the agreement in an effort to prevent the possibility of any takeover.

This content is only available to registered users

You must be logged in to continue

Gated access promo

Would you like to read more?

Register for free to finish this article

Due to the unprecedented challenge facing our industry at this time propertyweek.com will be entirely free to view to all users until 19 April. Register now to benefit from the following:

  • UNLIMITED access until 19 April
  • From 20 April, can still access up to four FREE articles per month
  • Breaking news, comment and analysis from industry experts as it happens
  • Choose from our portfolio of email newsletters

To access this article REGISTER NOW

Would you like print copies, app and digital replica access too? SUBSCRIBE for as little as £5 per week.

Registered users and subscribers SIGN IN here to continue