By Anthony Tanney, Caroline Shea, Falcon Chambers, Anthony Tanney Caroline Shea, Falcon Chambers30 July 1999
Legal This report examines the first case that tests whether section 2 of the Law of Property Act 1989 negates an oral conveyancing agreement that would otherwise be valid under the doctrine of proprietary estoppel
You must be logged in to continue
Register for free to finish this article.
Sign up now for the following benefits:
To access this article REGISTER NOW
Would you like print copies, app and digital replica access too? SUBSCRIBE for as little as £6 per week.