By Anthony Tanney, Caroline Shea, Falcon Chambers and Anthony Tanney Caroline Shea, Falcon Chambers30 July 1999
Legal This report examines the first case that tests whether section 2 of the Law of Property Act 1989 negates an oral conveyancing agreement that would otherwise be valid under the doctrine of proprietary estoppel
You must be logged in to continue
Try Property Week For Free to finish this article.
Sign up now for the following benefits:
To access this article TRY FOR FREE NOW
Don’t want full access? REGISTER NOW to read this article and up to 3 more this month and subscribe to our newsletters.
Registered users and subscribers SIGN IN here to continue
Site powered by Webvision Cloud