The court said that by virtue of the Human Rights Act 1998 it was obliged to adopt a balanced approach, considering questions of hardship to the defendant against the need to enforce planning restrictions.
You must be logged in to view premium stories.
Take out a print and online or online only subscription and you will get immediate access to:
To get access to premium content subscribe today
Alternatively REGISTER for a free trial to access up to 4 articles and sign up for email alerts